that will have the tooth a trickle poisoned, it will be hard to accept that certain injustices 's legal, it will be for us it is impossible even to speculate that abnormal crap like that we are experiencing are part of the real world and not a horror movie, it will be for this, or maybe because today there would be recriminations with our mother for taught us that values \u200b\u200bsuch as honesty, work seriously , commitment and other nonsense side are always rewarding , here is all this that we have decided to put aside the good manners and say things as they are.
As mentioned yesterday, unfortunately the news is that the Tar rejected our request for suspension . Made by us in advance and widely expected though (always the fault of the mother), until the last we have been negligent in maintaining a glimmer of faith in Italian justice. Short illusion from which we were now awakened, because the absurd is that this precedent was rejected precisely on the basis of the abuse that has generated . Translation: yes, said the Tar, the suspension we could have give it to you, but both the Kennedy are already inside the other, then what is it?
If we think about the strange forced eviction implemented in haste a few days of Tar by the municipality, that's all back, just as we had assumed and certainly it did not take a genius to figure that out. On the concept of how to "use" the Tar and / or "influence" justice, we refer instead to the large series existing in Italy.
A step back is still necessary per spiegare che la sospensiva era stata chiesta sia in base alla nostra controversa esclusione dal secondo bando (ritardata consegna di un autocertificazione per colpa di un elenco sbagliato del bando stesso) e sia per le GRAVI IRREGOLARITA ' presenti nel progetto Bertini approvato, errori per i quali SOLITAMENTE si viene ESCLUSI dai bandi , e a riprova abbiamo casi recentemente accaduti sempre al settore sport del Comune. Ma dato che la legge è uguale per tutti, ma per qualcuno è più uguale che per altri, nonostante la balbettante difesa dei legali della controparte, il Tar ha deciso che tali errori non avevano importanza (or stigmatized as an employee to work nicely: "In a case you weigh 100 and also the City weighs 100, but 100 of the Town weigh more than your" ).
who participated in any public announcement knows how Byzantine and rigid procedures. To understand, we're talking serious error as indicate the amount of the annual fee when it is expressly forbidden especially not follow the specifications of the contract which required the same protection of the sport, which as we have seen There is NO project Bertini, who has even stated in the contract have already managed the Kennedy, which it did in an unlawful manner, and above all a mess!
Faced with a City Council committee that breaks down in front of such claims and can not understand the nonsense contained in the field of sports (see hockey), what can I do if I think it hurt?
What do you want to be the delayed delivery of a self (which, however, because the City already had HCM 17 was another winner announcement) and that could be requested at any time without affecting the content of the call, face irregularities such as those described above?
And above all, because in our case we apply the letter of the regulation, while leaving the other free hand to a scandalous discretion? What kind of justice is this??
And how can you say that to grant a suspension at this point would complicate things, when art to have been complicated by Bertini's lawyers led by ATI and the City just to get such an opinion, without NO lift a finger to criticize? It 's crazy that no one wants to take the trouble to look into this matter, to clarify too many things that do not add , abuse of power, the oddities, the random failure, arrogance and mismanagement . The Tar Pilate has decided to postpone everything to civil justice, that is exactly what he wanted the City Council that has thus able to drag all the cows.
As mentioned yesterday, unfortunately the news is that the Tar rejected our request for suspension . Made by us in advance and widely expected though (always the fault of the mother), until the last we have been negligent in maintaining a glimmer of faith in Italian justice. Short illusion from which we were now awakened, because the absurd is that this precedent was rejected precisely on the basis of the abuse that has generated . Translation: yes, said the Tar, the suspension we could have give it to you, but both the Kennedy are already inside the other, then what is it?
If we think about the strange forced eviction implemented in haste a few days of Tar by the municipality, that's all back, just as we had assumed and certainly it did not take a genius to figure that out. On the concept of how to "use" the Tar and / or "influence" justice, we refer instead to the large series existing in Italy.
A step back is still necessary per spiegare che la sospensiva era stata chiesta sia in base alla nostra controversa esclusione dal secondo bando (ritardata consegna di un autocertificazione per colpa di un elenco sbagliato del bando stesso) e sia per le GRAVI IRREGOLARITA ' presenti nel progetto Bertini approvato, errori per i quali SOLITAMENTE si viene ESCLUSI dai bandi , e a riprova abbiamo casi recentemente accaduti sempre al settore sport del Comune. Ma dato che la legge è uguale per tutti, ma per qualcuno è più uguale che per altri, nonostante la balbettante difesa dei legali della controparte, il Tar ha deciso che tali errori non avevano importanza (or stigmatized as an employee to work nicely: "In a case you weigh 100 and also the City weighs 100, but 100 of the Town weigh more than your" ).
who participated in any public announcement knows how Byzantine and rigid procedures. To understand, we're talking serious error as indicate the amount of the annual fee when it is expressly forbidden especially not follow the specifications of the contract which required the same protection of the sport, which as we have seen There is NO project Bertini, who has even stated in the contract have already managed the Kennedy, which it did in an unlawful manner, and above all a mess!
Faced with a City Council committee that breaks down in front of such claims and can not understand the nonsense contained in the field of sports (see hockey), what can I do if I think it hurt?
What do you want to be the delayed delivery of a self (which, however, because the City already had HCM 17 was another winner announcement) and that could be requested at any time without affecting the content of the call, face irregularities such as those described above?
And above all, because in our case we apply the letter of the regulation, while leaving the other free hand to a scandalous discretion? What kind of justice is this??
And how can you say that to grant a suspension at this point would complicate things, when art to have been complicated by Bertini's lawyers led by ATI and the City just to get such an opinion, without NO lift a finger to criticize? It 's crazy that no one wants to take the trouble to look into this matter, to clarify too many things that do not add , abuse of power, the oddities, the random failure, arrogance and mismanagement . The Tar Pilate has decided to postpone everything to civil justice, that is exactly what he wanted the City Council that has thus able to drag all the cows.
Bello sucks.
(more. ..) 
0 comments:
Post a Comment